UCLA Engineering Students
Design Boats for Rooftop Race
Senior Design Course Challenges Skills
Date: June 17,2004
Contact: Marlys Amundson ( marlysa@support.ucla.edu
)
Phone: 310-206-0540
Anyone looking out onto the Engineering IV patio
at the end of Spring Quarter would have seen an unusual sight.
A crowd of students and onlookers gathered around a 16-foot tank
of water to watch three unique boats racing across the pool. The
competition was part of a mechanical and aerospace engineering
senior design class, and included two timed runs by each team's
boat, as well as a head-to-head race.

Boats built by Team Revolution and Team
SSLA skim the water in head-to-head racing action. |
Mechanical and aerospace engineering professor
Pirouz Kavehpour, who joined UCLA last year, restructured the
course this year.
"The class, as it was taught previously,
was fairly open-ended," explained Kavehpour. "Students
were asked to design and test shapes relevant to their fields.
I wanted to give them an interesting task with deadlines."
At the beginning of the quarter, Kavehpour and
his teaching assistants divided the students into teams based
on their answers to an in-depth questionnaire. He wanted to ensure
that each group would have students with strength in design, propulsion
and building to create a fair level of competition. Kavehpour
also appointed students as project manager and systems manager
in each group.
The project managers set the schedule and made
sure the finished product would meet all the specifications laid
out by Kavehpour. They also were on hand to provide a fresh set
of eyes to any problems that arose.
"It's sometimes easier to see a problem or
solution if you're coming from an outside view," said Kristan
Klinghoffer, the project manager for the Black Marlin group.
Each team was asked to design and build a boat
no more than two feet wide and a foot in length. The craft had
to include a mock radar tower that rose at least three inches
above deck, and an observation pod beneath the boat. Within each
team were three groups: one working on the boat's hull, another
on the propulsion system and a third on the radar tower.
The systems managers ensured that each team's
design groups were working in sync and that a change to one aspect
of the boat was relayed and considered by all members of the team.
They were also responsible for evaluating ideas and limiting the
amount of risk the group would take in its design.
The most challenging requirement posed by Kavehpour
was that the boats, which had to be self-propelled, could not
be powered by electricity, eliminating tradition power sources
such as batteries.
The three teams settled on three different methods
of propulsion. The Black Marlin propulsion team led by Matthew
Tharp explored several options, ultimately choosing carbon dioxide
(CO2) as their source of power for the engine.
"We needed a source that would be relatively
light, efficient and able to power the boat across the tank,"
explained Tharp. "We discarded springs and rubber bands,
and tested rocket fuel but decided it was perhaps too easy."
Their boat, which had been running well earlier
in the day of the competition, required last-minute adjustments
before making it across the pool late in the competition. The
boat with the fastest time, Revolution, made an end-to-end run
in 5.39 seconds.
Team S.S.L.A. used compressed CO2 for propulsion
of their craft. The Revolution group, which was not getting enough
torque from their Stirling engine, switched to an estes rocket,
commonly used in model rockets, for propulsion two days prior
to the race.
The teams also opted for different materials for
their hulls. Revolution's was made of alder wood and SSLA's of
fiberglass. Although harder to manufacture, the Black Marlin team
went with carbon fiber to build their hulls, which is both lighter
and stronger than other possible materials.
"We started with a plug made of wood in the
shape of our hulls to create a plaster mold," explained Kip
Kojima, who led the Black Marlin's hull team. "Then we cut
carbon fiber fabric and put it into the mold. After coating it
with resin, we put the mold and fabric into a vacuum bag and treated
it to harden."
Although the teams did not have to build a working
radar system, designing a system that would be both light and
aerodynamic presented several challenges. After testing other
design options, including traditional wing shapes, in the wind
tunnel, all three teams decided on a torpedo-shaped tower to minimize
drag and weight.
As part of the course requirements, Kavehpour
asked each team to submit a design report after four weeks and
a testing report in the eighth week that compared results to date
with their initial theories. These reports offered the students
a chance to develop their teamwork skills, and to gain a full
understanding of their boat's systems. Although learning to work
in larger groups presented a challenge initially, many of the
students in the course ultimately welcomed the opportunity to
apply both their practical sense and theories learned while at
UCLA to designing and building a working boat under rigorous constraints. |